NYU Presidential Global Debates
When envisioning the program, NYU President Emeritus John Sexton — a champion debater and debate coach — said, "The key idea of NYU as a global network university is that our students and faculty, regardless of location, are part of one university. While many of our pursuits, both scholarly and extracurricular, will be particular to one campus, as NYU continues to evolve as a global network university, many others will take place across the network."
The NYU Presidential Global Debates tournament competition returned in 2015 with a new home [the Business & society Program within the Stern School of Business] and under new leadership [Will Baker, Director of the Global Debate Fund].
The intra-school debate competition pits undergraduate debate teams from the entire NYU global network against one another in a contest that will award prizes totaling over $50,000. In the spring, the top domestic entrants and the top international entrants will form the Sweet 16 and participate in a single-day elimination that will culminate in a final round judged by a VIP Panel that includes key faculty and administrators at NYU.
A new resolution is determined annually and can be found on the Announcements page of the site or on the Facebook page.


Format For Domestic Competition
There are eight speeches in the debate. The first four are five minutes each, followed by cross-examinations from the other team.
-
1st Aff. Speech (5 minutes) | Cross-ex. By Negative (2 minutes)
-
1st Neg Speech (5 minutes) | Cross-ex. By Aff (2 minutes)
-
2nd Aff. Speech (5 minutes) | Cross-ex. By Neg. (2 minutes)
-
2nd Neg. Speech (5 minutes) | Cross-ex. By Aff. (2 minutes)
-
In these speeches, put out your arguments, supporting data, and, initial responses to the other side.
-
The next four speeches are three minutes long, and called REBUTTALS.
-
1st Negative Rebuttal (3 minutes) | 1st Affirmative Rebuttal (3 minutes)
-
2nd Negative Rebuttal (3 minutes) | 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal (3 minutes)
These speeches are the comparison of the merits of the arguments.
Rules


